To recover compensation in an injury claim, a claimant must show that the other person or party was negligent in some manner or did something wrong. Following a motorcycle crash, many motorists will argue they are the primary victim instead of the motorcyclist. A well-practiced motorcycle wreck attorney could argue the motorist’s careless behavior caused the collision with the motorcyclist. However, the unique aspects of Frisco motorcycle accident claims could make this endeavor challenging.
Additional Challenges
Another unique challenge in Frisco motorbike cases is that sometimes the operation of motorcycles is counter-intuitive compared to how someone would operate a car. As a result, reconstructing these accidents to show that the biker did everything they should have done can sometimes be difficult. This is especially apparent in “near-miss” accidents. For example, if a driver suddenly pulls out in front of a motorcyclist, the biker must either put the motorcycle on the ground or try to weave quickly around the vehicle to avoid the wreck. In the latter situation, the biker may end up hitting something else. Attorneys must show in these cases that the motorcyclist had no choice—that the other driver essentially put them in a difficult situation, and they only had moments to decide how to best protect themselves and others on the road.