Frisco Dog Bite Lawyer
Injuries sustained in dog bite cases can be very serious, potentially resulting in extended periods of medical treatment and even permanent damage. In the event of an attack by a domesticated animal, victims may be able to pursue monetary compensation for medical bills, corrective surgeries for scars and other types of permanent damage, lost wages, pain and suffering, mental anguish, and emotional distress. With the help of a Frisco dog bite lawyer, you could start building a strong personal injury case and working towards getting compensation for your dog bite. Contact a skilled personal injury lawyer as soon as possible. En Español.
Financial Recovery from Canine Attacks
Texas law provides several avenues of recovery for victims of serious dog bites, including the Texas one-bite rule, negligence, negligence per se, and intentional torts. A skilled Frisco dog bite lawyer could review the facts and circumstances of your individual case with you and assert the necessary legal bases for obtaining monetary recovery.
In cases where a dog previously bit a person or acted like it wanted to—or where the owner was aware of the dog’s prior vicious conduct—the dog’s owner may be liable to a bite victim for injuries sustained in a dog bite attack under the one-bite rule. This rule applies not only to dog owners but also to individuals who harbor or keep dangerous dogs and who are aware of their vicious tendencies.
Negligence and Negligence Per se
A dog owner may also (or alternatively) be liable to a dog bite victim if the dog owner did—or failed to do—something that a reasonable dog owner would not have done, thereby bringing about the dog bite victim’s injuries and damages. Injured parties should contact a Frisco dog bite lawyer if they are unsure of who is liable for their injuries.
Moreover, a dog owner is presumed to have acted negligently in cases where the dog owner violated a leash law or other Frisco animal control law. If the dog owner walks the dog without a leash or lets the dog roam around the neighborhood ‘at large,’ for example, there may be an automatic presumption of negligence, and the dog owner may be deemed liable for any injuries and damages the dog causes.
Defining Intentional Torts
An intentional tort, such as an assault or battery, requires a specific intent on the part of a dog owner to cause injury or damage to a bite victim. In the context of animal attacks, intentional torts usually arise in cases of provocation, where a dog owner provokes or incites their dog to bite someone. When this happens, the dog bite victim may be entitled to monetary compensation for the injuries and damages sustained.
Possible Defenses for a Dog Bite
Frisco dog bite lawyers know that a dog owner may be able to assert one or more of the several legal defenses in a dog bite case. If the bite victim was trespassing on someone else’s land at the time of the attack, they may be barred from achieving compensation for any injuries sustained. Any kind of provocation by the dog bite victim towards the dog that bit them can weaken their case as well.
In some cases, there is an assumption of risk by the dog bite victim that may reduce or even prevent them from receiving full compensation. For example, if a dog owner in Frisco posts a “Beware of Dog” sign on the fence surrounding the dog’s yard, a jury may find that a person bitten by that dog assumed a reasonable risk that such an injury might occur when they entered the yard, and may not hold the dog owner responsible.
Talking to a Frisco Dog Bite Attorney
Essentially, most defenses against dog bite cases attempt to argue that the victim of the dog bite in question contributed in some way to the dog bite incident occurring. This can raise questions of liability that a Frisco animal attack lawyer may be able to help avoid.
If you have sustained injuries because of a dangerous dog bite, a Frisco dog bite lawyer can negotiate with the dog owner’s insurance company on your behalf and fight for your legal right to obtain monetary recovery.