Benefits of an Expert Witness in McKinney Car Accident Cases

In a car accident case, the use of expert witnesses could be instrumental during a case. Expert witnesses can investigate a crash and based on the evidence, determine the cause of an accident. They could explain the nuances and various elements involved in the collision to a judge and jury.

Since determining liability for an automobile crash could be difficult, it is best to speak to a knowledgeable attorney to learn about the types of expert witnesses that may work best for your specific situation as well as the benefits of an expert witness in McKinney car accident cases. Consult with a seasoned car wreck attorney to learn more about how essential expert witnesses can be to your claim.

When to Use an Expert Witness

When an attorney uses an expert witness, they have a plan well in advance at the trial. Discovery control orders and the rules of civil procedure require that experts be disclosed ahead of time, often many months before trial. The disclosure sometimes requires their opinions, if nothing else, and certain courts require actual accident reports be produced to the other side many months before trial so the evaluation process can occur and depositions can be taken.

Using an expert during trial is limited only by the creativity of the lawyer. It is usually most effective to have the expert as a teacher to inform the jury how the expert came to their opinion, how the methodology is reliable, and why the steps taken are essential. The best experts get excited about teaching others why their science or discipline matters to the case at hand.

Benefits of an Expert Witnesses Testimony

The benefits of an expert witness in McKinney car accident cases is so that they can establish the evidence at hand and how the evidence impacted the wreck. Sometimes, the testimony can be in the form of affidavits, and if they are uncontested, affidavit testimony can prove medical bills are legitimate a less-expensive manner.

For many situations, the car wreck lawyer must have expert testimony or the courts will find that there is insufficient evidence of the action or damage element. An attorney has to consider not only what would and should affect the jury, but also the appellate courts and what they have ruled in the past and would likely currently rule.

The amount of weight the testimonies of expert witnesses are given in car accident cases depends on the jury. Some jurors will not believe certain expert testimony and discount it entirely. The law recognizes that jurors can tend to hold expert testimony in higher esteem. For that reason, there are certain mandatory minimums of competence and experience that the judge must perform to make sure the expert passes the minimum standards before they are allowed to testify.

Why Might Someone Not Want to Use an Expert Witness?

Just as there are many good reasons to have an expert witness in a person’s case, there are many good reasons not to have one. The number one reason why someone may not want an expert witness is because of the cost. Expert witnesses are very expensive. In many non-surgical cases, it does not make economic sense to hire a medical expert. It is better to get the medical records and the medical costs by affidavit and describe them to the jury without experts and let the jurors do what is fair and reasonable on a smaller case.

Call to Learn More About the Benefits of an Expert Witness in McKinney Car Accident Claims

A lawyer’s experience matters in determining whether one needs an expert and which experts they need for a particular case. Having an experienced lawyer makes all the difference because every situation in which someone hires or does not hire an expert is fact-dependent. It is best to speak to a knowledgeable attorney to learn about the benefits of an expert witness in McKinney car accident cases. Call today to learn more about how an expert witness could help you recover the damages that you deserve.