Rules of Liability in Murphy
Murphy dog bite laws require owners to take proactive steps to control their dogs. When a dog bites and injures someone, these laws can be used to hold a dog owner liable for an individual’s pain and suffering as well as for their medical bills. This liability is outlined in the one-bite rule illustrated in Marshall v. Ranne.
According to this rule of liability, a dog owner would not be held liable for a dog bite if the owner did not have a reason to know the dog would be aggressive or bite a person. This can allow a dog owner to avoid paying a dog bite victim for their injuries if this was the first time their dog showed aggression or bit someone. However, there are some important exceptions to this rule, and a dog owner may be held liable for a dog bite injury when:
- The dog owner knew that the dog had the potential to bite, such as the dog exhibiting non-social behavior or the dog displaying a habit of forcefully jumping on people
- The dog owner violated an animal control law laid out in The Murphy City Code Section 4.01.005, such as an owner not keeping their dog in a leash
Other exceptions may also apply based on the specific circumstances. To determine whether an exception to the one bite rule applies, it may be beneficial to consult a Murphy dog bite lawyer.